110 Comments
User's avatar
Truth Seeker's avatar

If everyone were paying attention they would have noticed the low numbers from the very beginning. There were no instances, anywhere, where entire businesses or families or schools etc. died at rates higher than normal. One of the reasons for the lockdown was to prevent people from seeing and hearing this first hand.

Expand full comment
Edward Teach's avatar

What happened on the cruise ships was repeated on the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt. 5000ish healthy young men living in close quarters and only about 20% of them were infected.

Those two data points (one elderly cruise patrons and the other young men) should have informed you that about 80% of the population at large wasn't susceptible at all to serious illness from the coof.

Expand full comment
Slats11's avatar

We knew very early on from Diamond Princess. IFR was perhaps 1%. That is in an elderly cohort with high rates of obesity, diabetes etc.

We were conned. Simple as that.

Expand full comment
Ron Mexico's avatar

This was when I knew it was complete bullshit. The aircraft carrier was all over the news for days and then when nothing happened completely disappeared. I was happy that it proved we were going to be ok and it was completely memory holed. The same thing happened in a prison at the same time - damn near 100% infection rate and zero deaths.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

Somehow those stories got pushed aside for the Omygod we’re all gonna die crap

Expand full comment
Slats11's avatar

Yes TR and various prisons. -although these are fairly young populations.

But a cruise ship - the average age is 70-something.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

The truth would have been so disappointing to the MSM.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

Only 20% tested positive for the virus on the USS Theodore Roosevelt. But about 60% later tested positive for the antibodies to the virus. So most people who got it were just barely grazed by it and didn't even know it, and yet they got a free antivirus update to their immune systems.

They really should have given everyone under the age of 40 who was even vaguely healthy a free cruise to build herd immunity even faster. But that would have made too much sense I guess.

Expand full comment
Edward Teach's avatar

Interesting that you mention that. The very same thing was observed with the French aircraft carrier Charles De Gaulle. @20% got noticeably sick, but most of the crew later tested positive for antibodies.

Expand full comment
NCmom's avatar

Ioannidis did notice from the beginning. I read and printed out this article on March 17, 2020. Actually I printed it out twice - a copy for each of my then 5 and 8 year old children. Every time an IFR would come out, it would confirm the lower end of his range. Every time the sheep ignored the actual scientists preferring the woke religious leaders the media told them to prefer.

We destroyed a generation of kids, freedom globally, prosperity, falling emissions, improving ecology, and low poverty because of the religion of the woke.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

You can say that again!

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

Remember the cruise ships? Couples locked in their rooms because one person tested positive; the other party never did.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

And how high of a cycle threshold were the PCR tests run?

Anything above 25-28, you could have a pineapple test positive.

Expand full comment
Rob D's avatar

AMEN.

Expand full comment
OBECALP's avatar

When was Cuomo packing nursing homes and what was the IFR in those instances?

Expand full comment
NCmom's avatar

March 2020-May 2020 and nursing home fatality was around 12%. It’s around 6% for other viral outbreaks per John Ioannidis. What was different is also that Cuomo caused hundreds of outbreaks by sending infected patients to the most vulnerable populations.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

The world was shut down for that????

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

The world wasn't going to STEAL itself.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

Haha. No, it wasn’t!

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

It was a planned, and extremely effective and persuasive, psychological operation.

Expand full comment
Sharon Wood's avatar

It was a Plandemic-scamdemic designed to destroy western civilizations so that the 1% can control our every move! Evil!!!! WEF has been working on this since 1971. Really sooner. Tech could allow it.

Expand full comment
Paul Ashley's avatar

No, the world was shut down for purposes of power and money for a select group of elites along with the destruction of the West.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

The pretext was an illness with a low death rate. Shame on the public for believing and obeying the authorities.

Expand full comment
Margaret Lombardi's avatar

So that Trump wouldn't be president. And everything his presidency would have prevented--Ukraine, etc.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

WHO wants the power to shut down the world and force injections on every human if they determine that ANY little fake virus is deadly.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

They want to shut it down even if the virus isn't deadly.

Expand full comment
Jim Brown's avatar

Way back in early 2020, Ioannidis's careful calculations convinced me that the vax was not necessary. Now it turns out his calculation was too conservative - the CFR was even lower than he thought.

Just think of the implications of the government, the media, and the medical profession ignoring Ioannidis's basic data. The entire COVID enterprise was and is a giant, self-inflicted wound.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

A wound “they” profited from greatly. While everyone else suffered from lockdowns, mandates, forced to take their poison drugs.

Expand full comment
Jim Brown's avatar

Like the song says:

"....Pick up my guitar and play

Just like yesterday

Then I'll get on my knees and pray

We don't get fooled again"

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

We won’t but the Covidians will be happy to have a new thing to fear

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

Wait until the release of the new Omicron brought to you by Fauci funded new gain of function research. HERE IN USA. They have made it 80% IFR.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

I read that this morning. How can they get away with this?

Expand full comment
Mark Oshinskie's avatar

Too late. All the damage is done.

People shoulda seen it from the jump. It was obvious.

https://markoshinskie8de.substack.com/p/coronamania-and-deficits-of-pattern

Expand full comment
Rob S's avatar

I made the same decision on the vax partly on Ioannidis' and data from around the world and local observation.

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

Seems a little early to look at this data. Don't we usually have to wait 75 years?

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

Yes, their plans for us are none of our business.

Expand full comment
John Henry Holliday, DDS's avatar

Has anyone checked if Amazon sells pitchforks and torches?

Expand full comment
scgator2001's avatar

what about trees and hangman's rope?

The advantage here is that the trees and the rope can be used to hang thousands.

And that's for each tree.

The only hang up would be the judges. Since it was treason we would need to use military tribunals.

Expand full comment
Rebel2Tyrants's avatar

We should start a COVID Survivor Group...

We could call it "The 99.9%".

Expand full comment
Nicole F's avatar

What an absolute scam of a "pandemic"

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Plan-demic

Expand full comment
Kirsten's avatar

Many of us knew this from the very beginning. I hope more and more start to realize exactly how they were made to believe differently - what methods were used to give them a different perception.

Expand full comment
Mark Oshinskie's avatar

Scamdemic so obvious from Day 1.

https://markoshinskie8de.substack.com/p/coronamania-and-deficits-of-pattern

Expand full comment
Toffeepud's avatar

"If it saves just one life....." we let the world burn and our kids suffer needlessly. I despair.

Expand full comment
Mark Oshinskie's avatar

I spoke out from Day 1. And every day since. I pissed off nearly everyone I knew.

Expand full comment
Toffeepud's avatar

Me too. Autistic blunt speaking lol

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

I got so sick of that phrase, “Can’t you wear a mask to save just one life?” Bah.

Expand full comment
Rob S's avatar

Two phrases I learned to despise during the freak out, "If it saves just one life" and "In abundance of caution." Both are fraught with phony concern and irrationality.

Expand full comment
Celayne Jones's avatar

I hated the smug “my mask protects you and your mask protects me”, too.

Expand full comment
DK's avatar

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

Wonder what "post-vaccination" IFR is.

Expand full comment
Bacon Commander's avatar

imma go with a solid 2.0% - just off the top of my head.

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

Glad I didnt go in for that then!

Expand full comment
scgator2001's avatar

Excess deaths in the US are about 20% above normal.

What is killing the extra people? That is rather obvious when you vaxxxxxinate millions with an UNTESTED potentially DANGEROUS drug. They called it a vaccine to get the dumbest of the dumb to get in line.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/sharpest-life-expectancy-drop-in-100-years-has-more-causes-than-covid-19_4757756.html

Expand full comment
Paul Ashley's avatar

And the dumbest of the dumb are still in line for yet another booster.

Expand full comment
Adrian Ryan's avatar

Nice study by Dr. Ioannidis. Thank you for reporting on it, I am guessing it will not be widely reported on in the MSM or in Public health circles.

From about the middle of 2020 I used UK ONS data and Worldometer and My World in Data data to make a rough mortality rate calculation. I increased PCR test produced “cases” by a factor of 5 based on CDC (and other sources) reporting on true infection levels. I came to a similar level for overall mortality rates for Covid 19, circa 0.2-0.3% and this was matched by Dr Ioannidis’s friend and Stanford colleague Dr Jay Bhattacharya, which I read about later. I am not a doctor or scientist but I have qualifications in Engineering, Finance and analytics. In addition other data points were available such as the demographics and health status of those unfortunate enough to die from Covid 19, i.e. the elderly and/or immune compromised, which was also available from sources such as the US CDC and UK ONS. 95%+ of all death by Covid had significant underlying health issues. 98% were over 45 years of age. Since the Covid vax the rate of death by vax status has rapidly climbed to over 94% vaccinated (UK ONS, last updated in July 2022 for months of May 2022), in a population with circa 75% vaccination rate, you do the mathematics…

Based on this mortality rate analysis I, medically unqualified, determined that the pandemic was an unfounded hysteria that did not justify reversal of decades long pandemic management doctrine in lockdown; ignoring of prior studies on mask efficacy and safety issues (see interviews with Dr Bhattacharya and Professor Carl Heneghan of Oxford department of evidence based medicine on this); wilful ignorance of very long held immune system boosting actions; active suppression of both the Great Barrington Declaration proposals for focused protection and repurposed well known drug treatments for those at risk and, crucially, throwing out the long standing procedures for safety and efficacy assessment in clinical trials, which by definition is NOT what was done to get tacit approval for the so-called Covid vaccines.

If I could determine all that in the middle of 2020 (subsequently for the vax) then how the hell could professors of medicine and science and doctors not also see this??? This is the question that must now be answered and urgently. In the meantime we must demand a cessation to all Covid related policy and any further WHO led claims of health emergency until these questions are answered.

For the record:

- I am not vaccinated against Covid 19 but also not anti vax as such, although my eyes are turning to this industry now and more questions over other past vaccines must be addressed. I will never allow these death shots near me or my family.

- I am anti lockdown (period) and refused to comply

- I am anti mask wearing and refuse to comply

- I have had Covid at least twice, probably more times and confirmed close exposure contact with Covid positive people multiple times (too many to count)

- I reject the so-called “trusted news initiative” and no longer trust the public health bureaucrats, nor the peer review system (see Peter Doshi of the British Medical Journal on this) nor doctors in general.

Expand full comment
B England's avatar

For that, worldwide governments injected their populations not just once, but twice, three times and four times with experimental gene therapy injections, wrongly categorised as a 'vaccine' with no long term safety data and now we know direct fro Pfizer admission last week in EU Parliament they did not even test their injections to check it stopped transmission. Everyone needs to ask the question WHY?

Expand full comment
Slats11's avatar

You seen this Michael?

https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/86.pdf

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

No doubt Michael has seen it as he is listed in the court documents. I was curious about the details of this lawsuit; you can see all the relevant documents chronologically listed at https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63290154/missouri-v-biden/ Even for a non-lawyer there's some interesting reading.

There is an extensive list of defendants including the short-lived "Ministry of Truth".

I was curious that most of the individual defendants are members of the Biden Administration, and some of the complaints listed happened during the Trump Administration. However, several government agencies including the CDC and the Department of Homeland Security, and Anthony Fauci, are listed as defendants. So that's good.

Expand full comment
Tarnia Evans's avatar

We now live in an anti-universe where the establishment want us to believe the opposite is true.

How we get back to before this insanity is beyond me.

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

We will never get back to how it was - new frontiers upon us to be explored, but I suspect there is going to be a "Time of Transition", or at least I hope there is going to be said. The alternative, I reckon to be frank, is simply extinction of the failed human species in my humble opinion. Seems like an easy choice to somebody and anybody with an open mind, but hells-bells group-think evidently is a powerful force indeed, and big egos I suspect even if you dropped them in a volcano they would still argue they were not mistaken.

With that said, I didn't realize your post was from October 2022, and that in a way makes this whole thing even more sad, twisted, funny, and sick I suppose.

May the best ideas prevail is what I think - I've said that from the get go - but some big egos don't die easy, but die they will.

BK

Expand full comment