I wonder if some of it has been generated by a mass media that pits groups against one another, causing each to get more extreme in reaction to one another.
I wonder if some of it has been generated by a mass media that pits groups against one another, causing each to get more extreme in reaction to one another.
If you look across the media spectrum you can divide it into 2 big groups - one group is fighting back against the pseudo-science, and this is usually the non-liberal media, and the non-multinationals.
If you then study the mass media companies that have from the start promoted the Covid-19 policies of Xi Jinping (did you see my article on this while you were reading my articles?) -then this is what you find:
1. It is the liberal legacy media companies
2. They are all mass media, multinational media companies, e.g. CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post, BBC, the Guardian, etc. or Internet based magazines which are liberal e.g. Politico, The Atlantic etc...
3. These all companies that are usually owned by companies which are 1. Either doing business in China eg. CNN is owned by AT&T, 2. owned by the swamp of global investmre ent companies that are part of the World Economic Forum - e.g Vanguard and Blackrock - which allows them to appoint the board of directors and control the policies - woke Twitter is a great example of that.
4. The media companies that are getting funding or advertising dollars from the Davos billiionaires and their foundations -e.g. Bill Gates has for years funded the public health section of the BBC
5. Media companies that are getting most of their advertising income from big pharma companies and the Chinese Communist Party
6. These media companies have been supportive of China, sought to protect China - e.g. the virus didn't come from the Wuhan lab, and generally overlook stories unfavorable to China - e.g. that it is ramping up its war machine as we speak
These are the key factors. All roads lead to the Davos billionaires, the World Economic Forum and China's CCP.
And what do they all have in common - they want global governance and the Great Reset.
So they have deliberately divided American's especially since the Occupy Wall Street movement shook them up.
This is a great little summary you just wrote, thank you! Yes, these media companies are multinational, have different investors, have different corporate products other than media, they want all markets open to these products, which also have investors. What a tangled web! Black Rock and Vanguard own everything. Sovereign national governments are the fly that keeps buzzing around, preventing total freedom to use their power as they wish.
I subscribe to your substat, I don't think I read the China stack yet.
It's an extremely tangled web done at a global level and enacted within the borders of nation states. It is a decentralized hidden fascist force that has been operating in my opinion since post WW2, when the Nazi's lost, but most of them fled with their wealth and companies. The earliest link that I can find to the globalization of capital and power is the INTOSAI organization, that is an 'audit' group formed in 1953, and headquartered in Havana, Cuba until the revolution. Here's their 50 year report. Read it slowly with a mind to reading between the lines - and catch the long term agenda to subvert nations, to globalize capital, and to create global governance. They also helped to create the Lima Declaration, which was an instrument of mass destruction-and this report boasts about how successful it was. (If I gave you this already sorry for the repetition.) Everything we are up against is the fascist capitalists that originate post WW2 in my opinion.
So true what you write about liberals. 😐
I wonder if some of it has been generated by a mass media that pits groups against one another, causing each to get more extreme in reaction to one another.
Yes, you are 100% on the money.
If you look across the media spectrum you can divide it into 2 big groups - one group is fighting back against the pseudo-science, and this is usually the non-liberal media, and the non-multinationals.
If you then study the mass media companies that have from the start promoted the Covid-19 policies of Xi Jinping (did you see my article on this while you were reading my articles?) -then this is what you find:
1. It is the liberal legacy media companies
2. They are all mass media, multinational media companies, e.g. CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post, BBC, the Guardian, etc. or Internet based magazines which are liberal e.g. Politico, The Atlantic etc...
3. These all companies that are usually owned by companies which are 1. Either doing business in China eg. CNN is owned by AT&T, 2. owned by the swamp of global investmre ent companies that are part of the World Economic Forum - e.g Vanguard and Blackrock - which allows them to appoint the board of directors and control the policies - woke Twitter is a great example of that.
4. The media companies that are getting funding or advertising dollars from the Davos billiionaires and their foundations -e.g. Bill Gates has for years funded the public health section of the BBC
5. Media companies that are getting most of their advertising income from big pharma companies and the Chinese Communist Party
6. These media companies have been supportive of China, sought to protect China - e.g. the virus didn't come from the Wuhan lab, and generally overlook stories unfavorable to China - e.g. that it is ramping up its war machine as we speak
These are the key factors. All roads lead to the Davos billionaires, the World Economic Forum and China's CCP.
And what do they all have in common - they want global governance and the Great Reset.
So they have deliberately divided American's especially since the Occupy Wall Street movement shook them up.
Not pretty.
This is a great little summary you just wrote, thank you! Yes, these media companies are multinational, have different investors, have different corporate products other than media, they want all markets open to these products, which also have investors. What a tangled web! Black Rock and Vanguard own everything. Sovereign national governments are the fly that keeps buzzing around, preventing total freedom to use their power as they wish.
I subscribe to your substat, I don't think I read the China stack yet.
It's an extremely tangled web done at a global level and enacted within the borders of nation states. It is a decentralized hidden fascist force that has been operating in my opinion since post WW2, when the Nazi's lost, but most of them fled with their wealth and companies. The earliest link that I can find to the globalization of capital and power is the INTOSAI organization, that is an 'audit' group formed in 1953, and headquartered in Havana, Cuba until the revolution. Here's their 50 year report. Read it slowly with a mind to reading between the lines - and catch the long term agenda to subvert nations, to globalize capital, and to create global governance. They also helped to create the Lima Declaration, which was an instrument of mass destruction-and this report boasts about how successful it was. (If I gave you this already sorry for the repetition.) Everything we are up against is the fascist capitalists that originate post WW2 in my opinion.
Ivan
https://www.intosai.org/fileadmin/downloads/documents/open_access/INTOSAI_Publications/Publication_50y_INTOSAI/INTOSAI_50th_Anniv_EN.pdf