According to newly-released discovery documents, Andy Slavitt, acting as Senior Advisor to the COVID-19 Response under President Biden, specifically targeted Alex Berenson for censorship due to his views on Covid mRNA vaccines. This is the same Andy Slavitt who argued for a strict, Chinese-style “90% lockdown” in July 2020.
Aug 12, 2022·edited Aug 12, 2022Liked by Michael P Senger
What do you want to bet that the MIT study visual Andrew Slavitt used to justify violating First Amendment rights by the Biden administration was an outgrowth of another infamous MIT study - by the exact same researchers?:
Andrew Slavitt's referenced MIT study:
The Data Visualizations Behind COVID-19 Skepticism
Researchers: Crystal Lee, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle Inchoco, Graham M. Jones, Arvind Satyanarayan
For those who will say TL/DR, the 16-page study basically finds that individuals who do top-notch scientific research, even credentialed experts, worthy of publication in prestigious scientific journals are purveyors of dangerous mis/disinformation and must be shouted down or censored. Not because they are wrong, but because the findings are "unorthodox" and differ from the consensus. Because critical thinking skills leads to independent thought and that is dangerous, best left to the experts who are in that consensus.
Now, we all know that a consensus of Marxists will have different findings than a consensus of Libertarians, so the invitation list to form that consensus is a pretty important part of the findings.
Read the report for yourself. As a "Skeptic" reading through it I found myself overcome by joy many times, the Sally Fields in me often jumped up and said, "They get me, they really, really get me!" Validated, so many compliments and findings that validated us, were virtues and things to aspire to...back when science was science and critical thinking skills were encouraged and developed, honed. Now declared dangerous. Needing to be censored. The world turned upside down type of stuff. Just read it. Then you'll know all you need to know about the mindset of those deigning to run our world and lives today. And their justifications for censoring us.
The message from the Biden administration is:
"Independent, critical thinking is Verboten! Nein!"
another reason not to use Facebook and Twitter. They not only don't allow free speech (our right) they actively blocked everyone who did not consent with the narrative. All on board on Substack and other platforms, that allow discording sounds !!
Aug 12, 2022·edited Aug 12, 2022Liked by Michael P Senger
One billion bucks to persuade vaccine uptake. Included in the price was to wipe out 'dissenters'. There is far more to this, as in the why. Why was there the 100% CCP style repression of scientific debate? One billion paid for coerced compliance and the attempted destruction of rule of law, open debate. All censored, criminalised and politicised. One billion dollars.... and agents of this like Slavitt, Birks, Fauci. Useful dangerous idiots.
I posted this on bad cat's post but more or less the comment applies as well: someone ought to do the work to determine the costs per state via medicaid that the vaccines have inflicted. from which states can then go after tech and media akin to master tobacco settlement; ie they (tech) give up 230 protections with state action doctrine. further class action rico should take form from another angle as they would be two different lawsuits that form together like tributaries meeting their mother rivers. https://madisonian.substack.com/p/to-kill-leviathan
I suspect they figured he'd made himself a pariah in the circles that ordinarily ought to have at least made feeble gestures of support, and he'd be an easy kill. His temperament works against an excess of sympathy. Been enjoyable to see what's coming out, but we'd all better gird up our loins for what's gonna lie ahead. "Lie" being an important word here.
When does the public get relief from the criminal CCP bio attack? Our federal govt does not seem too interested in investigating their actions for the most part. Who and what are they protecting? Fauci? Gates? CDC? NAIH? All of them ?
“Persuadable public”… social engineering, coercion, people who need US to think for them.
You’re only good enough to pay the bills but we will decide what you can see, think or feel.
What do you want to bet that the MIT study visual Andrew Slavitt used to justify violating First Amendment rights by the Biden administration was an outgrowth of another infamous MIT study - by the exact same researchers?:
Andrew Slavitt's referenced MIT study:
The Data Visualizations Behind COVID-19 Skepticism
MIT, March 1, 2021
http://vis.mit.edu/covid-story
Researchers: Crystal Lee, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle Inchoco, Graham M. Jones, and Arvind Satyanarayan
The Original MIT study that begot the study Slavitt referenced:
Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online
MIT , January 20, 2021
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.07993.pdf
Researchers: Crystal Lee, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle Inchoco, Graham M. Jones, Arvind Satyanarayan
For those who will say TL/DR, the 16-page study basically finds that individuals who do top-notch scientific research, even credentialed experts, worthy of publication in prestigious scientific journals are purveyors of dangerous mis/disinformation and must be shouted down or censored. Not because they are wrong, but because the findings are "unorthodox" and differ from the consensus. Because critical thinking skills leads to independent thought and that is dangerous, best left to the experts who are in that consensus.
Now, we all know that a consensus of Marxists will have different findings than a consensus of Libertarians, so the invitation list to form that consensus is a pretty important part of the findings.
Read the report for yourself. As a "Skeptic" reading through it I found myself overcome by joy many times, the Sally Fields in me often jumped up and said, "They get me, they really, really get me!" Validated, so many compliments and findings that validated us, were virtues and things to aspire to...back when science was science and critical thinking skills were encouraged and developed, honed. Now declared dangerous. Needing to be censored. The world turned upside down type of stuff. Just read it. Then you'll know all you need to know about the mindset of those deigning to run our world and lives today. And their justifications for censoring us.
The message from the Biden administration is:
"Independent, critical thinking is Verboten! Nein!"
another reason not to use Facebook and Twitter. They not only don't allow free speech (our right) they actively blocked everyone who did not consent with the narrative. All on board on Substack and other platforms, that allow discording sounds !!
One billion bucks to persuade vaccine uptake. Included in the price was to wipe out 'dissenters'. There is far more to this, as in the why. Why was there the 100% CCP style repression of scientific debate? One billion paid for coerced compliance and the attempted destruction of rule of law, open debate. All censored, criminalised and politicised. One billion dollars.... and agents of this like Slavitt, Birks, Fauci. Useful dangerous idiots.
this is dynamite. great job!
Please tell me these gov’t officials can go to prison for this.
This is going to be quite the ride. I believe THIS is the visual Slavitt was referring to. https://covidreason.substack.com/p/did-white-house-advisor-use-mit-study
I posted this on bad cat's post but more or less the comment applies as well: someone ought to do the work to determine the costs per state via medicaid that the vaccines have inflicted. from which states can then go after tech and media akin to master tobacco settlement; ie they (tech) give up 230 protections with state action doctrine. further class action rico should take form from another angle as they would be two different lawsuits that form together like tributaries meeting their mother rivers. https://madisonian.substack.com/p/to-kill-leviathan
I suspect they figured he'd made himself a pariah in the circles that ordinarily ought to have at least made feeble gestures of support, and he'd be an easy kill. His temperament works against an excess of sympathy. Been enjoyable to see what's coming out, but we'd all better gird up our loins for what's gonna lie ahead. "Lie" being an important word here.
When does the public get relief from the criminal CCP bio attack? Our federal govt does not seem too interested in investigating their actions for the most part. Who and what are they protecting? Fauci? Gates? CDC? NAIH? All of them ?
Ryan Horath has been discussing this and wrote a piece on section 230. Above my pay grade but maybe you may find it worthwhile.
https://rthorat.substack.com/p/eff-section-230-claims-vs-reality?r=88dyo&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Wow, the government targeted individual citizens for censorship.
Above my purview but ryan horath wrote on section 230. I think this is the problem.
https://rthorat.substack.com/p/eff-section-230-claims-vs-reality?r=88dyo&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email